Currently, sigprop that passes and become coreprop grants the prop’s author’s gotchi of choice 150 exp
even if it is created as part of a DAO funded team/project or other forms of paid duty
Exp should not be granted to author’s gotchi for sigprop that passes if the sigprop was created for the following purpose:
DAO funded task force/team/individual (i.e. paid by the hour) creates a sigprop for proposed change and/or as part of their duty
- Example: Alch/Gltr Task force (channelling change etc.),
DAO funded projects (i,e, paid by lumpsum) creates a sigprop as part of the project
- Example: Forge Team (continue funding, proposed change/release), Bonding Curve Transition Team (Liquidity provision)
Pixel Craft Team Member: creates a sigprop as part of their paid duty
-Example: Closing the bonding curve
The above scenario involve team, projects, personnel that is creating sigprop as part of their official duty.
EXP has monetary value as it is part of the protocol reward: Rarity Farming
Such sigprop should not “double paid” the author for passing a sigprop as they are already being compensated for their work.
Moreover, even if the sigprop fails, they are still being paid.
Sigprop that passes but does not involve any funding from DAO (i.e. ghst, DAI, USDC) should continue to receive exp (no change)
Sigprop created by Pixel Craft Team member outside of work time and is not part of Pixel Craft Operation
Original Sigprop that ask for funding / formation of team/projects
This should be enforced by Pixel Craft as they are the ones who performs “exp drop”
I think it is best to leave PC to decide if a sigprop fells under the category of “created as part of paid duty” base on above
(most sigprop are created by the DAO and PC will act as a impartial party)
After each announced “exp drop” for sigprop author exp DAO/PC should have someone(or script) designated to verify said author’s gotchi did not receive exp as intended.
If it was found that exp was granted by mistake, PC should try to revert it. If that is not possible, future exp should be withheld to compensate for extra exp granted
This should apply to all sigprop created after this sigprop passes coreprop
Should the original sigprop that ask for DAO funding also not give exp to the author? (This is not covered by this sigprop and will continue to grant exp)
I never made a sigprop before would greatly appreciate any help/feedback.
Thanks for reading