AGIP13’s core proposal is unique because, as @coderdan said in Discord, this is the first core proposal that had pretty much no influence from the dev team. That being the case, the proposal is unfortunately a bit light on details around the ramifications of the proposed change.
While these forums serve as a way to summarize discussions in a more controlled manner than discord, they can still become quite cumbersome to sift through. We need something better for voters who are not actively engaged in DAO activities outside of votes.
The proposal here is to amend the template that core proposals currently follow… it will ultimately be up to the dev team to uphold this standard for now, but this will cease to be an issue once the DAO reaches its adulthood. Within any core proposal there should be a brief summary of the arguments for or against the change. At least one bullet point on each side would suffice, but ideally there would be several points on each side to help voters make educated decisions. This process could even be delegated to a committee that works directly with the dev team to provide this brief for the time being.
Without this, I fear that more and more voters will be voting without fully understanding the weight of each option. As the game and ecosystem get more and more complex, so will core proposals which further increases the likelihood of voters participating without fully understanding.