Hello frens,
Yes, Coderdan did mentioned, “the good news is that we have about 8 slots left for wearables in contract memory to fill before we’ll need to completely redo the smart contract.”
One idea that was proposed by coderdan was to have “vanity slots” that override the stats slots, which I personally think is a great idea.
Coderdan then asked, “what do you guys think of having special wearable collections with royalties? created by some of the big crypto artists like xcopy, hackatao, etc” saying that, “Basically they would give a kickback/royalty to the artist on each trade, and would only be aesthetic, no stats”
With that being said, I just want to pose some questions.
What is the standard that we as a community want to set for these “vanity slots?”
Do we want to leave it up to the discretion of Pixelcraft to choose big crypto artists?
Do we have the community vote on the best wearables to also give the little artisans around the world a chance to showcase and monetize their talents?
Is there a happy medium solution where Pixelcraft can fast-track a big artist while the little artisans still have opportunities for upward momentum?