The average amount of portals in a wallet right after the sale was around 6. So that definitely wasn’t a problem. In fact some people got burned for trying to get more than 5 in one transaction since getting filled with a lower amount was more likely.
How does this benefit “whales”?
The result is out, what are the next steps?
Do our voices mean something to the project?
Yessir, your voices have a meaning. If you guys can get us some concrete numbers like I mentioned above, there’s no reason why this proposal can’t be included as an option in the final community vote.
6 Likes
Yes! Tottally agree!
Would also be keen to make sure the snapshot time is within a reasonable space before the actual launch. That way all the last minute stakers of GHST are included in the 1 portal Haunt 2 plan.
Not sure if this is been discussed, but I firmly believe this haunt should not be identical to Haunt 1 with regards to labeling and identification. Same rarity chances, etc, but a clear, distinctly different haunt.
Don’t have the skills to do it 
So we need the CSV of all the polygon adress of people that would have the opportunity to buy 1 portall with the haunt number zero ? that’s right ?
So we do have to cross the data from people who did succeed to buy and those who don’t at the time of the haunt 1 ?
Is there a data Magician can do that ?