As I’m watching votes accumulate I’m surprised. Many people are voting for a repeat of Haunt 1 with a more extreme ape tax. I do feel this is better than the pre-paid option as far as not devaluing the rarity. BUT, no one is voting for 10k portals limited to 1 per wallet. I feel this is the most fair option and still helps gotchis overall retain value and rarity while allowing WAYY more users to get a gotchi (though not everybody). It would still take 30 min to sell out I’d guess but better than 30 seconds
1 Like
Do u want to know why? Check out the top 10 wallet addresses that voted for 25k portals and u will see that most of them dont even own any (expensive)gotchis or wearables. They want their GHST to moon so they don’t care about diluting the current market
4 Likes
again reach ppl voting for 25k where they can buy more than others. unfortunetly, the supply already more than the demand. just have a look at the Bazara. plenty of portal still closed. it is reduculase to call for second haunt
2 Likes
This begs the questions discussed elsewhere in this forum about how we govern the DAO (Cocoon (AavegotchiDAO 1.5) dual voting system, 1 Aavegotchi = 100 GHST vote). Voting needs to balance the interests of GHST assets with the interests of Gotchi assets. I think issues pertaining to the game mechanics, especially haunts, portal distribution and acquisition costs, should be determined primarily by those with Gotchi assets.
6 Likes